I must say after reading the article I don't see why anyone would arrive at Evolutionary Creationism just from reading the text. It seems like one has to have an idea of it before coming to the text.
That's fine to say, but if you don't see any reason to think this, you must give reason why he's wrong. I think this makes a pretty good case for Theistic Evolution. And yes I am a Theistic Evolutionist, but I would still like to ask you what your response?
Feel free to browse through the blog.